Tag: Norwich

  • Norwich – Robin Hood (Two Julians)

    Norwich – Robin Hood (Two Julians)

    20250131_171325

    This visit was from a few weeks ago (as part of our Two Julians tour of Norwich since we’ve already straddled great chunks of the Waveney), when we meandered to the Robin Hood pub located near to the Cottage and also not far from Barrack Street.

    There has been a pub with this name since the mid-eighteenth century, but it was in a different location. Here’s an early 1880s map of where it was, with the pub looking out onto Barrack Street and there was no shortage of other pubs along that street. Soon after this, the pub was moved to its current new purpose building which faces onto Mousehold Street. It then became a Watney Mann, then Courage and then Pubmaster pub. It’s somewhat of an unlikely survivor as it’s tucked away on a back street and indeed it has been closed for some short periods over the years.

    In the Eastern Evening News in January 1884 it was reported that the landlord, Frederick Marcon, had gotten himself into some trouble.

    “Frederick Marcon of the Robin Hood public-house, Pockthorpe, was summoned for assaulting Stephen Curl, Barrack Street, fish-hawker, on the 27th inst. Mr. Linay appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Sparrow defended. The assault was committed on Sunday evening last at the Robin Hood public-house. It appeared that Curl, accompanied by his brother and a man named Hicks, went to the Robin Hood. Defendant’s brother was also present, and without any provocation whatever struck complainant’s brother, causing him to be thrown to the ground. On his getting up defendant continued the assault by seconding his brother’s efforts, and on complainant going to his brother’s assistance, he was struck on the cheek and nose. Complainant was also thrown to the ground, and while in that position both the Marcons kicked him. The two companions of complainant were also called and corroborated. For the defence, Mr. Sparrow called defendant’s brother who said that one of them ordered some ale, but this was refused by his brother on account of their being “half drunk.” Defendant then asked them if they had come in for a row, and they replied with an oath that they had come with that object. The three then commenced on witness, and when defendant tried to protect him he was also struck. Hicks it appeared remained neutral, for he took up his position in a corner and watched the proceedings. The two Curls were eventually removed by their father and mother.

    William Curl, brother of complainant, now charged the defendant Marcon with assaulting him at the same time. Curl was thrown to the ground, and while in that position he was kicked by Maroon on the head. Stephen Curl, the first complainant, also preferred a charge of assault against Thomas Marcon. Defendant hit him once in the cheek, knocked him down, and kicked him in the ribs. William Curl also charged Thomas Maroon with a similar offence. Curl alleged that Maroon struck him on the lip, the result of which was that he fell to the ground. Mr. Sparrow now urged that it was positively absurd to suppose that a landlord and his assistant should on the appearance of three customers immediately strike them, especially when there was no provocation to warrant it. The Bench then retired and on their return into Court the Chairman said that after carefully weighing the evidence in their minds they had come to the conclusion that they ought to convict. The defendant Marcon would be fined for the assault upon Stephen Curl 10s. and 15s. costs; in default, fourteen days’ hard labour; and for the assault on William Curl, a fine of 5s. and 9s. costs would be inflicted; in default, fourteen days. Thomas Marcon, for assaulting Stephen Curl, would be mulcted to the amount of 10s. and 7s. costs, in default 14 days; and for the assault upon William Curl, his brother, a fine of 20s. and 7s. costs would be imposed; in default 14 days.”

    Probably a little sub-optimal for the pub landlord…. Fortunately, the welcome when we arrived at the pub was much more engaging from the current staff member although the venue did get in the news around three years ago when there was some considerable controversy relating to charitygate, but I’ll let individuals Google that if they so desire as I don’t think it relates to the current owners.

    20250131_171711

    Some of the beer selection.

    20250131_172047

    I went for the John Smiths and it tasted as expected and was reasonably priced. I also always appreciate when a pub stocks Mini Cheddars.

    20250131_172510

    The pool table rather dominates matters in the main room, meaning they have to sit carefully around the edges of the room as is visible from the above seating, and then there’s one other smaller room. There’s a strong community element to this venue and the darts and pool teams are important to them. There was a bucket to catch the drips from the leak upstairs, but the staff member did apologise for that arrangement.

    20250131_173133

    Julian looks enthralled, but he’s not really a TV in pub type person. Indeed, nor am I, but it added some musical entertainment to our visit. There is karaoke every Sunday afternoon and although this is evidently not going to encourage me in, it looks like a popular event. The TV must be a recent addition as the then owners were telling the EDP in 2023 that they were proudly a TV free zone. Since I always have a little look at on-line reviews…

    “Came here with the pool team just too find out that it’s not child friendly, the owners allowed our captains child in for this time (via phone call) fair enough. Then get told the child can’t just press buttons on the fruit machines (not actually gambling/playing) anything because of licensing, for your information review the licensing laws on gambling as you clearly don’t know the laws and it’s not against the law for kids to be in a pub after a certain time it’s just a in-house rule, get out of your 1920’s pothole and get with the times.”

    There’s one quite, er, direct review that the pub probably quite rightly didn’t respond to. I recall long ago when getting my licence that the law is quite clear that children shouldn’t be using these AWP machines in any shape or form, so it’s not unreasonable for a landlord to ask children not to play on them even for fun. And it is against licensing law for kids to be in a pub after a certain time if that’s what their licence says. Anyway, nearly all of the other reviews are positive, so as to add some balance.

    It’s a pub that is off the beaten track and so is very much a community pub, but the welcome was friendly and clean, although it did need something of a refurbishment in places. All rather lovely, it’s worth popping in for anyone nearby.

  • Norwich – Cricketers’ Rest [Closed] (Two Julians)

    Norwich – Cricketers’ Rest [Closed] (Two Julians)

    20250212_165424

    This pub closed in late 2010 and I never visited it, but I’ve walked by it many times and watched it fall further and further into disrepair over the last decade. The pub opened in the 1870s and was something of a survivor (well, until it shut) as a Victorian corner pub and it was a Bullards, then Watney Mann, then Norwich Brewery, then Brent Walker, then Pubmaster venue and then Park Taverns operated. It was purchased by Norfolk based Tager Inns in 2002 who at that time had 11 pubs in the county and they were looking to buy a further nine. The Morning Advertiser reported at the time that the company had been founded by Neil Gear in 1999 when he bought his first two pubs in Great Yarmouth, the Mitre in George Street and the Norfolk Tavern in Crown Road. There’s little information on-line about Tager Inns, but soon after they were purchased by London Inn Group, who got themselves into trouble soon afterwards and went bust in some spectacular fashion with the administrators struggling to even work out what pubs they owned. This pub was caught up in that and was sold to free trade, but it didn’t last long and we are now where we are.

    In terms of the name, this is the only pub that has been called the Cricketers’ Rest in Norwich, which makes finding newspaper articles about it much easier than somewhere like the King’s Head where there are tens of the things. Above is the advert from Bullards in 1905, mentioning that there was good stabling, a yard and a large club room.

    And here it is in 1884, with the stabling element visible in the rear yard and that space remains there today behind some locked wooden gates.

    In 1907, the Norfolk Chronicle reported:

    “A DANGER TO THE COMMUNITY

    Thomas Richard Alden (19), groom, pleaded guilty to feloniously breaking and entering the Cricketers’ Rest, Hall-road, Lakenham, belonging to Messrs. Bullard and Sons, Ltd., and stealing therein from a slot meter 12s. 11d., the moneys of the British Gas Light Co., Ltd., and also 4s. 3d., and two bottles of beer, belonging to Messrs. Bullard.”

    He was sentenced to nine months in prison for that, with hard labour. It was a busy time for the pub, as three years later, the same newspaper reported:

    “Alfred Stowers, landlord of the Cricketers’ Rest public-house, Queen’s-road, was summoned for permitting drunkenness on his licensed premises on January 29th. Mr. G. A. Perkes appeared for the defence.–Police-sergt. Christie said that in the Cricketers’ Rest was a man who had just previously been ordered out of another public-house for being drunk, and later he was arrested for being drunk and disorderly. Defendant made no attempt to get the man out of the house until witness called his attention to his condition, and then he said the man had only been in the house a minute, and had had no drink there.–Corroborative evidence was given by Police-constable Seager, and for the defence it was submitted that, although the man was drunk, defendant did not know of it. The landlord was very busy at the time, and the man was in the house less than five minutes.–The Bench thought the case one for investigation, but considering that defendant had done his best to prevent drunkenness on the premises it would be dismissed.”

    This is Google Streetview from 2008. I can’t imagine that the Cricketers is at all viable now, the insides of the venue are unlikely to resemble a pub still and the amount of repairs would be costly. Which makes this a sad loss of a Norwich pub, although fortunately there are still several in the nearby area.

  • Norwich – Champion (Two Julians)

    Norwich – Champion (Two Julians)

    20250212_173417

    Next in our little adventure out in Norwich was the Champion pub. First opened in the 1830s, it is said that it was named after the boxer Daniel Mendosa (1764-1834). I had a little read of the Wikipedia page about him which says that Mendosa was not really considered a champion at the time, so initially, I was doubtful about the actual origins of the pub name. However, this doesn’t ring true, there are scores of newspaper articles from the beginning of the nineteenth century referring to Mendosa as a champion, so the claim is quite likely valid. The pub themselves note:

    “The pub is known to date back to at least eighteen forty five. It is named after a London Jew, Daniel Mendozer, who was an extraordinary middle weight fighter. He became English Champion, which was then, equivalent to World Champion weighing 160lb. He was acclaimed the first scientific fighter and after he retired he toured across theatres, and visited Norwich in 1790. In his act, which included no violence or indecency, he depicted various heroic styles of great boxers.”

    The reliable Norfolk Pubs put the opening date of the pub at 1836, but I wonder whether it was likely just a little earlier and closer to the death of Mendosa. There’s a newspaper article from 1843 which notes how a game of bowls was played at Thomas Garwood’s bowling green outside his pub and they were playing for “a handsome pair of silver-mounted drinking horns”, the equivalent of the bar billiards plates of the day no doubt….

    I can’t quite place the location of the bowling green, but I suspect that it’s the empty space between the pub and the Methodist Chapel. That space is still there today, although it’s become something of a mini traffic island, it’s also the home of the St. Stephen’s Square Community Garden.

    Anyway, that distraction aside, the pub was operated by Lacons by the beginning of the twentieth century. Whitbread bought out Lacons in 1958 and promptly shut it down soon after, although they kept this pub until the 1990s when it was sold to a private buyer. Batemans took over the pub in 2007 and the bulk of the real ales are brewed by them and this venue is also listed in the Good Beer Guide. This is one of two Batemans pubs in the city, the other is the Kings Arms on Hall Road.

    20250212_170918

    The pub’s old divisions between different rooms might have been removed, but it’s evident (because the signage is still there) how this pub was once divided between the saloon and lounge bar. This was once the saloon bar element and the area that I took the photo below in is the old lounge bar. I was excited that I had my new glasses and could read all the bottle names that were placed on that top shelf, before I would have to zoom in using my phone. There’s also a back room, which is visible in the rear of this photo, which then leads to the toilets.

    20250212_170417

    The beer selection and they also had the XB from Batemans. That’s also the beer that Julian went for and reading his Untappd it was “as tasty as ever”, so that’s high praise as he can be picky about his beer. Julian mentioned that he used to go in this pub a lot during his younger days, although, frankly, he can truthfully say that about a lot of the pubs that we visit…. That reminds me that I forgot to add an anecdote he told me about the Rose, so I’ll have to write separately about that.

    20250212_170558

    I went for the XXXB (Triple XB) which is a 4.8% beer from Batemans which was well-kept and was smooth and it had a pleasant malty taste with some toffee. I would have preferred a more decadent brand of crisp, but I am quite picky on this matter and that’s not really the pub’s fault. And, life would be boring if every pub had Tyrells, Pipers, Seabrooks, Ringos, Quavers and Hula Hoops to meet my needs. On the subject of food, I understand that they have some home-cooked food options between 12.00 and 15.00 and then 18.00 to 20.00 on Wednesdays to Saturdays. I am always very supportive of pubs and look for every single positive, but I do have to note for reference that the pub is currently sitting on a 1 star food hygiene rating from Norwich City Council and I will simply link to the report so individuals can make up their own minds.

    The service was friendly, the environment was clean and the beers were of a good quality, so its inclusion in the Good Beer Guide seems like an excellent idea to me.

  • Norwich – Rose (Two Julians) (Rose Inn / Rose Tavern)

    Norwich – Rose (Two Julians) (Rose Inn / Rose Tavern)

    20250212_161428

    Next up on our little Two Julians visit around Norwich was the Rose on Queen’s Road. The pub was first opened in 1855 and it became a Bullards pub at the end of the nineteenth century, then Watney Mann in 1967, Courage in 1972, Adnams in 1984 and then free trade in 2003 (thanks to https://www.norfolkpubs.co.uk/norwich/rnorwich/ncrot9.htm for this). Julian talks fondly of the former look of the pub’s exterior, but I’m too young to remember it, although George Plunkett has a photo of the side of the building from 1934.

    Firstly, it took me a little time to clear up the historic record of what this pub is actually called, as this has made it hard to link old newspaper articles with the correct pub. It’s historically the Rose Tavern, but is currently called the Rose, Rose Pub & Deli or the Rose Inn, I assume to differentiate it from another pub with a similar name in the city. Today, any mention of the Rose Tavern is likely referring to the one on Rupert Street. As some extra excitement, this pub is listed in the Good Beer Guide.

    Just as a total aside of very little consequence other than it interested me, this is an early brand deal arrangement back from November 1912:

    “STRONG NORWICH EVIDENCE.

    ZAM-BUK RESCUES CHILD FROM WET DISFIGURING ECZEMA.

    There is a ring of real gratitude about a Norwich mother’s account of the cure by Zam-Buk of her daughter’s shocking eczema. Florence Hicklin is the 14-years-old child of Mr. and Mrs. Richard Nicholls, of the Rose Tavern, Queen’s Road, Norwich. To a “Norwich Mercury” reporter the mother said:—

    “The eczema started with small itchy places on Florence’s head. The disease spread rapidly, weeping sores breaking out all over her scalp and completely covering her face. The child suffered great pain in her head and eyes, and she was so ashamed of her awful disfigurement that she flew to a vacant room whenever visitors were shown in.

    The itchy wet sores ravaged Florence’s skin frightfully, though I persevered carefully with the treatment specially recommended by a chemist. I also took the child to the hospital. On my way home from the hospital one day I bought a box of Zam-Buk and determined to give the balm a thorough trial.

    When I started with Zam-Buk Florence’s head and face were in an awful condition. Within a few days, however, there was a marked change. The balm worked like magic through the crusts of sores, destroying the disease and soothing my child’s awful itch and pain, and I reproached myself for not having tried Zam-Buk earlier.

    Keeping carefully to the Zam-Buk treatment I got my reward by seeing all Florence’s disfiguring sores cleared away and replaced by new skin. The girl is now quite free from disease, and has a much healthier and clearer skin than ever she had before I used Zam-Buk. I am deeply grateful for this splendid cure.”

    There is only one Zam-Buk, and that is the highly refined preparation sold only in sealed packages bearing the trade mark “Zam-Buk” on the outside. It is prepared from certain valuable herbal extracts by scientific processes which are known only to The Zam-Buk Co., by whom they were discovered and perfected. A box of Zam-Buk retains its wholesomeness for any length of time, and it is guaranteed free from lard and all animal fat or impurity; its healing strength never varies. Of all chemists, at 1/1½ and 2/9 per box.”

    And, I’m intrigued to see that Zam-Buk is still produced and is being sold in a number of South Asian countries. Anyway, I’m glad that Florence’s skin cleared up. There must have been something of a local fight as the Yarmouth Independent (the name of the newspaper, not the current Great Yarmouth MP) reported in February 1936 that Florence Freezer (a rather memorable name) had assaulted Dora Harvey, the landlady of the Rose Tavern. However, Freezer’s address was given as 233 Queen’s Road, which is also the address of the pubs, it all sounds like something of a drama.

    20250212_161605

    The events list and I do know how good the Weird Pancakes are, so that’s always recommended.

    20250212_161747

    I had just picked up my new glasses and hadn’t gotten used to taking them off to see what photos I had taken, so there are some which are slightly sub-optimal in terms of quality. Anyway, here’s the keg options with a suitably blurry element to it. The beer selection is well curated and most beer styles are represented here.

    20250212_161759

    The real ales. The service was prompt and polite, although we were the only customers throughout our visit and so we were unlikely to be left waiting long to be served.

    20250212_161833

    Cheeseboards, as the pub has a deli counter, and Good Beer Guide books from over the years.

    20250212_161922

    These images really aren’t great, but my new phone arrives this week so expect some sharpening up on quality. Well, maybe. I’m surprised, just as it’s a little unusual, by how many high tables there are in the pub, but that’s not a complaint, as they’re my personal preference to sit at in terms of comfort.

    20250212_162022

    This is the only bar billiards table that I haven’t played on in Norwich (and I’m pleased to note that I was an early player on the new table at the Artichoke so that one is ticked off my list). My team of the Serengeti plays there next week as a friendly against the Rose, but I’m not in Norwich to join them, but one day I’ll get to play there (although I’ve been saying that for years)…..

    20250212_162223

    I went for the Make it Pacific Sunrise beer from the formidable Brew York brewery. A hoppy, light, fluffy little number. Julian went for the Hop Stash from Nene Valley, which he was suitably impressed by but the brewer has made it impossible to add with any accuracy to Untappd as the pump clip doesn’t mention which hops are in it and there are numerous versions. The beers were both well-kept and at the appropriate temperature, so no issues there.

    20250212_162247

    The beer list and I like how well placed this is so it’s easily possible to see the options available. The Rose did have their beers listed on Untappd which makes things easier, but it does come at quite a price and I can understand why they don’t. I also rather like that they’ve made it clear that 1/3 measures are available, it’s rare that pubs selling craft beer don’t allow this, but it’s helpful for it to be pro-actively mentioned.

    20250212_162431

    The pizza list and I know from past experience that the quality is high.

    Overall, I’ve visited here a fair amount over the years, with the service always being friendly and attentive. It must be a little challenging for them as they’re away from the main drag of Norwich city centre pubs and it would be easy to overlook them, but it’s definitely worth making the effort to get here. There’s real ale, craft keg, cheese boards, pizzas and bar billiards and that to me sounds like a rather lovely combination of things. I have nothing negative to note about the pub, it’s a comfortable and well-run venue, with the beer quality being high and its position in the Good Beer Guide as entirely justified IMO.

  • Norwich – Berstrete Gates (Two Julians)

    Norwich – Berstrete Gates (Two Julians)

    20250212_153257

    Next in the Two Julians Norwich series is the Berstrete Gates which, as a disclosure, has been one of my favourite pubs for some time. I accept it’s not a craft beer haven, but many years ago a group of us used to go to the Berstrete Gates every Friday and the lovely owner, Hang Pham, merrily cooked for us every week.

    Located on Ber Street, the history of this pub is complex and long, starting with when it was known as the King’s Arms in the early eighteenth century. A few weeks ago, I found an old theatre group mention in a newspaper from nearly 300 years ago and I think they were performing here. Above is the auction details of the pub when it was put up for sale in June 1879 and it had also been auctioned in January 1867 when it was known as “the old King’s Arms”. There have been twelve pubs in Norwich city centre with the name King’s Arms (including another one on Ber Street), so some form of differentiation was necessary. The current building is from the mid to late nineteenth century (I think from around 1870s from maps) and it isn’t listed, with many of the interior features hidden behind some paint, although it retains some charm. Although Nikolaus Pevsner said that the building was “uninteresting”, so don’t come here expecting beautiful pub architecture.

    The pub took its current name of Berstrete Gates in June 1937 as it’s very near to the site of where the Ber Strete Gates entrance to the city was located. The gate had been pulled down in 1808, although it dated from the early twelfth century, as part of the destruction of the walls and gates in the city. There’s more about the history of the gate at https://www.norwich.gov.uk/site/custom_scripts/citywalls/29/29.html.

    20250212_153321

    The beer board which is visible when entering the pub and it tells its own story. This is a cheap and cheerful venue, the beer comes in cans and bottles, the product range is limited and the service is exquisite. In more recent history, this was taken over just before Covid by Gary Harvey and I think the timing of his taking over was all a bit unfortunate with a global pandemic ongoing. My friend James and I did go there in that period and the welcome was friendly, personable and immediate. I remember we were offered sausage casserole they had left over from a wake and we promptly then went about four times in that week as they were closing relatively soon after. The furniture layout was unusual to say the least, everything was based around a large central table that looked a little bit more meeting-like than pub-like. I think that the plan was to create a pub where people would talk to others when they entered, but on our final visit there a number of rather young looking girls were scrawling on the walls and so it felt best to retreat back to an adult’s pub. Since January 2024, Hang Pham has taken over behind the bar once again.

    20250212_153725

    The Guinness cost £2.50, a perfectly reasonable price. To add some variety to our visit, Julian went for a can of Holsten Pils, also priced at £2.50. Does beer drinking get much more decadent?

    20250212_154912

    The bar. In not trying to be on-trend, I think it’s strangely become more authentic. It’s quite a stark design and the back room doesn’t seem much used, but it is what it is.

    20250212_161233

    The signage outside and it’s fair to say that it could do with a little of bit of exterior repair work.

    20250212_161244

    The mural was created by John Moray-Smith (1889–1958) in 1938 when the pub was owned by Morgans Brewery. They had purchased it in the 1920s from George May brewery and through acquisition it became part of Bullards, Watney Mann, Brent Walker, Pubmaster and then finally free trade in 2002. George Plunkett, a photographer who has recorded so much of Norwich’s history which might otherwise have been lost, took a photo of it soon after the mural was installed.

    This is not a destination pub, it feels much more like an estate pub that just happens to be relatively near to the city centre. It’s got some considerable charm to it and although there’s a chance that it’ll end up as an on-trend craft beer bar in a few years if it doesn’t work out in its current iteration, I rather like what it currently is and the little bit of a local institution that it has become.

  • Food from Every Stall on Norwich Market (2025 Edition) – Week 1 and Indian Feast

    Food from Every Stall on Norwich Market (2025 Edition) – Week 1 and Indian Feast

    20250212_130716

    Thanks to James agreeing to help with this project, here we go again with the 2025 edition of eating food from every stall at Norwich Market and first up was the vegan Indian stall, Indian Feast. And here’s what happened when we visited in 2023.

    20250212_125428

    The menu board. My plan is to always have something different compared to last time, although it required some quick checking at the market stall to remember what we had last time. I quite fancied the samosa chat, but that’s what I went for last time (this is going to happen a lot this year I suspect), so this time it was the Aloo Tikki Chat. There’s no real change to the menu other than the addition of the vegan chicken curry, with the price increases being £1 on all the meals and 50p on all the snacks. One element that will be evident this year is how much food price inflation has gone on at the market and whether or not that is likely to put customers off going to stalls.

    20250212_125608

    One of the food displays which doesn’t necessarily look overly appetising in terms of the presentation, but there we go. What is more important is that the service was timely and friendly, the payment process was efficient and the stall accepts cash and card.

    20250212_125743

    The Aloo Tikki Chat and I went with all the options that came with it including the coriander, the mint chutney and the tamarind sauce. The mixed vegetable cake added texture to the dish and there was plenty of chickpeas in the whole arrangement which bulked matters out. There was some spice to it and the pieces of onion also added texture with the food having a depth of flavour to it.

    20250212_125810

    There’s a seating area which overlooks the kitchen. Only a limited number of the stalls at the market have a seating area and it’s always helpful so that I don’t have to worry about a seagull swooping down and stealing my vegetable cake.

    20250212_130359

    The Covid sign is still visible saying that the track and trace is in operation. That felt something of a throwback.

    IMG-20250212-WA0001

    Eagle eyed readers might guess that this is the photo that James took given he’s got an eye for this sort of thing and I accept this does look better than mine. James went for the Aloo Gobi, which he enjoyed but thought was a bit wet. I think that was the summary of the matter.

    It’s a light and tasty meal, the stall was clean and the service was friendly, with the prices seeming reasonable for the quality and quantity.

  • Norwich Market Food – Let’s Do It Again in 2025

    Norwich Market Food – Let’s Do It Again in 2025

    ****** 2025 NOW FINISHED – Here are the results *****

    Thanks to all the stall holders for so much marvellous food and drink throughout 2025. We got it down to six stalls (with great difficulty) and they’re listed in the above link.


    One of my more popular series of blog posts, often attracting extra visitors beyond my two loyal readers, was when I visited every food stall at Norwich market across 2023. Given that, my friend James and I have decided that we’ll do it all again. The excitement of it all! Last time the top three we decided were:

    3rd : Cocina Mia

    2nd : Lucy’s Fish and Chips

    1st : Bodega (in photo above)

    The rules are the same, the visit will be randomly drawn and we’ll work through all of the market stalls. I will attempt to have something different food wise to what I had before, to make a vague attempt at variety. It’s positively scientific this…. There have been some changes since 2023 with some stalls closing and some opening, but that all adds to the excitement. There are still, I think, 29 locations to visit, but we’ll also add a Toby’s visit at some stage as they’re the beer stall supplying craft beer options. They might get multiple visits and we’ll likely pop to Brick as well. It will be a challenge to get around 29 locations in 2025 (NB – it transpired to be 32), but where there’s a will then there’s a way.

    2025 VISITS

    A Taste of Punjab (Week 19)
    And Eat It (Week 31)
    B’s T’s (Week 28)
    Bodega (Week 25)
    Bread Source (Week 15)
    Buka Street (Permanently closed)
    Bun Box (Week 13)
    China Wok (Week 7)
    Cocina Mia (Permanently closed)
    Chocolate Bar Baker (Week 29)
    Churros for the People (Week 17)
    City Taco (Week 18)
    Coral Bay (Week 6)
    Crunch (Week 20)
    Deb’s (Week 10)
    Falafel and Friends (Week 5)
    Go Crepes (Week 11)
    Henry’s Hog Roast (Week 8)
    Indian Feast (Week 1)
    Italian Street Food (Week 16)
    Jacket Spuds & More (Week 9)
    Little Red Roaster (Week 30)
    Lucy’s Chips (Week 2)
    Lucy’s Fish and Chips (Week 12)
    Norwich Fresh (Week 4)
    Papa Mombassa (Week 22)
    Rabbits Salad Bar (Week 32)
    Reggies (Week 24)
    Ron’s Chips (Week 3)
    Ruby’s (Week 26)
    Taste of Shanghai (Week 21)
    Tasty House South East Asian Street Food Emporium (Week 27)
    Thai Bubble (Week 14)
    The All Electric Banger Stop (Week 23)
    Walsingham Farm Shop (Permanently closed)

     

    2023 VISITS

    A Taste of Punjab (Week 4)
    And Eat It (Week 18)
    Bodega (Week 15)
    Bread Source (Week 27)
    Bun Box (Week 16)
    Chimneys (Week 3) [now closed]
    China Wok (Week 1)
    Churros for the People (Week 7)
    Cocina Mia (Week 12)
    Coral Bay (Week 20)
    Deb’s (Week 17)
    Delight (Week 9)
    Falafel and Friends (Week 25)
    Feast (Permanently closed)
    Go Crepes (Week 29)
    Henry’s Hog Roast (Week 5)
    Indian Feast (Week 13)
    Italian Street Food (Week 24)
    Jacket Spuds & More (Week 14)
    Lucy’s Chips (Week 22)
    Lucy’s Fish and Chips (Week 26)
    Meat and Co (Permanently closed)
    Norwich Fresh (Week 10)
    Reggie’s (Week 19)
    Ron’s Fish and Chips (Week 2)
    Ruby’s (Week 6)
    Taste of Shanghai (Week 8)
    Tasty House South East Asian Street Food Emporium (Week 21)
    Thai Bubble (Week 23)
    The All Electric Banger Stop (Week 11)
    Walsingham Farm Shop (Week 28)

  • 200 Years Ago in Norwich : Body Snatching in Hethersett (Thomas Able)

    200 Years Ago in Norwich : Body Snatching in Hethersett (Thomas Able)

    Another in my little series of posts from the Norwich Mercury 200 years ago this month.

    “Sirs,

    A great sensation has been occasioned in this neighbourhood, by a body recently being taken from the church-yard of Hethersett. This, though so distressing to the feelings of surviving relations, is an evil which will never be prevented, unless a sufficient number of human bodies can by other means be obtained, for the purpose to which this, no doubt, has been applied, and which, for the advancement of a science, the most important to the welfare of the human race, is indispensably requisite. I have long been of opinion, that the bodies of ALL malefactors who are executed should be delivered to the surgeons: this would operate as a two-fold good—for I am persuaded it would tend greatly to the prevention of crime.

    Hardiment, who was executed here about two years ago for murder, felt, as I have been credibly informed, a much greater horror at that part of his sentence which subjected his body to dissection, than at death itself. Two men were condemned at the same Assizes, for having set on fire some premises in or near Diss. A short time before their execution they expressed a strong desire to see their prosecutor; told him they felt persuaded, that if buried at Norwich, their bodies would be taken up, and requested him to make them a promise that they should be taken to a church-yard they named, at the distance of about twenty miles, which being granted, they became comparatively easy. This account I received from a professional gentleman who had been employed on their trials.

    I would not, however, stop here: I would also give up to the surgeons the bodies of all who execute themselves, excepting those only, who it should be clearly proved, had been under restraint from imputed insanity or lunacy. This would, I have no doubt, greatly tend to prevent self-murder, and I have, almost under my own eye, a much stronger proof in print, than that in the case above stated.

    In the Spring, 1821, R. residing in a neighbouring village, cut his throat, though not so as to occasion death. In the Spring, 1822, L. residing in another neighbouring village, hanged himself: an inquest was held, and, as usual in such cases, it was adjudged that he was at the time insane. Immediately after this, R. said to some of his neighbours, “though L. hanged himself they buried him in the church-yard.” The next morning the body of R. was found hanging and dead.

    Feb 8th, 1825. Your’s, &c. &c. A.B.”

    The church where the body snatchers struck was St Remigius in Hethersett. I was able to find out that the burial was of a “poor old man” on Sunday 30 January 1825 and his body taken on the Wednesday.

    He wasn’t named at the time in the media, but there was only one burial that day at the church which was Thomas Able, a 73 year old man from the village and this fits the description of an “old man”. His wife died on 23 December 1846 and was later buried at the same church, so she must have suffered terribly. At the time, it was thought that a body going to be dissected wouldn’t go to heaven, which is why it was an extra punishment for those condemned to death by the courts and why the letter writer suggested people who committed suicide should have their bodies taken, something which happened in Germany at the time. The theft of a body wasn’t a criminal offence in 1825, as long as any clothing or other items weren’t taken away at the same time, which is why they were left at the site. The matter was mostly resolved by the passing of the Anatomy Act in 1825, legislation which was long overdue as fear of a loved one’s body being removed became a slight national obsession.

  • 200 Years Ago in Norwich : Sentenced to Three Months Tread Wheel for Non-Performance of Bastardy Order

    200 Years Ago in Norwich : Sentenced to Three Months Tread Wheel for Non-Performance of Bastardy Order

    In my little series of posts from 200 years ago, there’s a one line article on the court reports for 1825 that reads:

    “By the decision of magistrates, Charles Smith, for non-performance of an order of bastardy – three months tread wheel”.

    The tread wheel was a relatively new invention at this time, having been designed by Sir William Cubitt and introduced in the prisons of Bury St Edmunds and Brixton. The punishment varied, but Charles was likely on the tread wheel for around six hours a day, which must have been healthy but also tiring and probably rather annoying to say the least.

    The concept of bastardy orders has roots in English common law, where children born to unmarried parents were deemed filius nullius, meaning “child of no one”, which does feel a slightly harsh way for a youngster to start their life. These children lacked legal standing in society and were prohibited from inheriting property from their father unless legitimised, which could be done rather more easily for the landed gentry. These children could not claim support from their parents, and the responsibility for their care initially fell upon monasteries and local councils. The Poor Law of 1733 in England stipulated that the putative father was responsible for maintaining his illegitimate child. Local authorities would issue public funds to maintain the mother and child until the father could assume responsibility.

    The 1834 New Poor Law in England introduced a Bastardy Clause, representing something of a significant shift in social and legal approaches to illegitimacy. This clause shifted the responsibility for illegitimate children from the parish to the mother and this change aimed to deter illegitimacy and reduce the cost of poor relief by placing the burden on unmarried mothers . The Bastardy Clause was rooted in the principle of “less eligibility”, which sought to make workhouse conditions less desirable than even the lowest paying jobs, thereby discouraging reliance on poor relief. A Royal Commission into the changes that became the 1834 Poor Law stated that the existing system gave generous payments for illegitimate children and indemnified the mother against failure to marry, noting:

    “The effect has been to promote bastardy; to make want of chastity on the woman’s part the shortest road to obtaining either a husband or a competent maintenance; and to encourage extortion and perjury.”

    Charles Smith is too common a name for me to be able to work out much about him, but the parish officials would have made an Order which required him to pay for his child and it’s evident that he didn’t make those payments.

  • 200 Years Ago in Norwich : Conman in 1825

    200 Years Ago in Norwich : Conman in 1825

    Back to my little series of posts about the Norwich Mercury from 200 years ago. It’s hardly a surprise that there were conmen operating in Norwich 200 years ago, but it must have been a lot harder back then to actually spot such deceit when it happened. The Earl of Caithness at the time was Alexander Campbell Sinclair, 13th Earl of Caithness, with the fraudulent man pretending to be his son. He was perhaps unfortunate to have discovered a naval officer who was able to ask penetrating questions about the Earl of Caithness, otherwise he might have gotten away with his little scam. It’s a nice little phrase from the newspaper though, “preparing for the execution of a master-stroke of swindling”, as there are some politicians that could be said about today.