
I arrived at the new King’s Lynn Library in a slightly unhelpful frame of mind, because I had already decided that I wasn’t going to like it. This was not based on having actually entered the building, which would obviously have been a more conventional approach to reviewing somewhere, but because I liked the old Carnegie Library on London Road and was sorry to see the library service leave it. I was therefore pre-annoyed by its replacement, which at least saved valuable time having to become annoyed once I arrived.

This is the new ground floor area of what was Argos, although the old library had rather more history on its side. Designed by H. J. Green and built in 1904, it was largely funded by Andrew Carnegie and was formally opened by Carnegie himself on 18 May 1905. The Grade II listed building is an attractive mixture of red brick, terracotta and stone, with a Gothic design influenced by the Arts and Crafts movement, complete with a three-storey entrance tower and the names of writers displayed around the building. It served King’s Lynn for more than 120 years before the library moved out, although the building itself has a future, with The Garage Trust taking it on for cultural and community use.

More books on the ground floor. The replacement opened on 16 March 2026 following a £17 million redevelopment of the former Argos building in New Conduit Street. It spreads across three floors and combines the library with adult learning facilities, meeting spaces and other community services. None of this particularly helped with my determination not to like it, since a former Argos store replacing a Carnegie library does not initially sound like one of civilisation’s more obvious advances.

Some of the seating on the first floor. Unfortunately for my carefully prepared prejudices, I rather liked it. The main library space felt spacious without becoming cavernous and there was a genuinely decent selection of books which seemed properly curated rather than simply arranged to fill shelves. There was a useful mixture of seating, plenty of power points and free wifi, so it worked equally well for somebody wanting to browse, read, study or sit with a laptop pretending to undertake something they consider important. This latter category perhaps represents a substantial proportion of modern economic activity. The official design includes expanded collections and dedicated quiet study areas, and in practice it actually felt as though some thought had gone into how people might want to use a modern library.

More seating on the first floor and there was certainly space and I was particularly impressed by the acoustics. Modern open public buildings can sometimes achieve the remarkable feat of amplifying every conversation, dropped object and excited child across several thousand square feet, but that wasn’t the case here. The children’s section has its own dedicated area, including a castle-themed library and play space, but it felt sufficiently separated that children could enjoy themselves without the rest of the library having to enjoy themselves at precisely the same volume. The rest of the building remained pleasantly quiet, which is one of those qualities that ought to be fairly fundamental to a library but can no longer necessarily be taken for granted. This seems a remarkably sophisticated concept and I hope knowledge of it spreads to certain other libraries.

There were also enough different sorts of chairs and tables that nobody appeared to be fighting for the one tolerable place to sit. I suppose a criticism could be made that the library was really very quiet, but I think I can manage to cope with that. I strongly dislike Norwich Central Library, there’s no space, the acoustics are terrible, the surroundings are too loud and it’s much more comfortable and quiet in JD Wetherspoon. I haven’t been since they reopened the library last week, but I’m pre-annoyed about that too.

The local history section and I’m pleased to say that they had a Pevsner Architectural Guide to the area, my usual measure of the usefulness of the library.

There were also some old books on display, something which always pleases me. This book is the “List of Mayors and Notables Events 1348-1659” and it was published in 1660. I rather like the idea that somebody reached the end of 1659 and decided that more than three centuries of municipal administration really ought to be written down before everyone forgot what had happened.

This book from 1653 is an early anatomy book and I’m not convinced by the accuracy of this plate.

So I was surprised and delighted, which is mildly irritating when I had made such a good start on disapproving of the whole thing. I still prefer the old Carnegie building as a building, and I suspect I always will. A handsome Edwardian library opened by Andrew Carnegie himself has an architectural and historical advantage which a converted Argos is unlikely to overcome. But as a functioning library for King’s Lynn in 2026, the new building is spacious, quiet, comfortable, well equipped and apparently very carefully thought through. I went in expecting to mourn what had been lost and came out thinking that, actually, they might have got this one right. All really rather lovely.
































































