Category: UK

  • Foxley – Church of St. Thomas the Apostle (Mabel Annie Purdy – 1883-1913)

    Foxley – Church of St. Thomas the Apostle (Mabel Annie Purdy – 1883-1913)

    20250511_150708

    This grave at the Church of St. Thomas the Apostle caught my eye as it commemorated the life of Mabel Annie Purdy who died according to the gravestone at the young age of just 28. I was initially confused as the church’s birth register notes that a Mabel Annie Purdy was born on 25 November 1882 and baptised on 15 February 1883. However, I then noticed a birth of Mabel Annie Purdy on 7 August 1883 and baptism on 26 October 1884, so I assume the first little girl died and they wanted to give their next child the same name. Both girls were the daughters of Henry Purdy, a publican, and Rosina Purdy (nee Connell). The pub that they ran was the Chequers in the village, which closed in 1968, but apparently the pub sign remains in place so the building on Stocks Hill remains. Henry was a farmer and he was the licensee of the pub between 1863 and very early in 1913, when he died, which is quite a tenure.

    Mabel was mentioned in the Eastern Evening News on 14 April 1902 when her beautiful singing in a concert in Bawdeswell to raise money for the Foxley church bells was mentioned. These church bells have had a substantial amount of fund raising over the years…. The Downham Market Gazette also mentioned on 29 December 1900 that Mabel was excellent at needlework and the Eastern Daily Press on 24 October 1901 mentioned that Mabel and her sister Ada were bridesmaids at the wedding of Albert Green and Edith Purdy. At least those newspaper mentions add a little colour to the detail of her life, I always find it a little sad when it seems nearly nothing is known.

    Mabel died on 23 April 1913, not long after her father died. Unfortunately, I can’t find any mention in the local newspapers as to why she died, so that remains a mystery for the moment at least…

  • Food from Every Stall on Norwich Market (2025 Edition) – Week 12 and Lucy’s Fish and Chips

    Food from Every Stall on Norwich Market (2025 Edition) – Week 12 and Lucy’s Fish and Chips

    20250514_131743

    This week’s episode of James and I working our way around every food stall at Norwich Market. And, this week, it was a visit to Lucy’s Fish and Chips, where James and I have been going for over a decade and which received the incredible accolade as our second (well, my second as I’m writing it) stall in 2023. James only walked by three people he knew today, although I suspect there were more as he disguises the interactions to pretend he’s anti-social. The stall also has a sister outlet on the market which we’ve already visited this year.

    20250514_131748

    The menu and the prices, with an apology printed on the counter that price increases have been necessary due to increasing costs. The price increases are in keeping with other stalls, with the haddock going from £5 to £6.50 in two years and the cod from £6.50 to £8. The stall accepts cash and card, although there’s now a sign stating that they prefer cash. The queueing system felt suitably logical and the stall was constantly busy when I was there, with a wide selection of different items being ordered.

    20250514_131816

    The specials are visible in the background and a reminder that they use vegetable oil here. There’s also a vegan and vegetarian menu available to broaden their appeal to non-fish eaters.

    20250514_131859

    I decided against the battered cauliflower, though to be fair, anything’s an improvement on plain cauliflower. The service was friendly, engaging and personable, although it helped that they knew James as they probably remembered some odd social interaction he had with them years ago or some joke or pun he made. There’s an informal and inviting feel to this stand, so I felt welcome. I went for the small cod, chips and curry sauce for £6.50, which I thought was reasonably priced. It took twelve minutes to be prepared which seemed a long time as James got him immediately, but sometimes food is worth the wait and they were busy.

    20250514_133917

    The seating area where we were able to get a seat, although James had a bit of a wait to get us one. Not that it mattered to me as I was standing on the other side of the stall excitedly waiting for my number to be called out. The problem with us deciding these stalls on the day is that I don’t know in advance to bring my own ketchup, as I’m too tight to pay whatever the cost is here. The seating area was clean and ordered, with customers sitting here fairly reliably having ordered from the stall and not being interlopers from nearby stalls which don’t have their own executive seating area.

    20250514_133010

    The cod was larger than I expected and they had forgotten the scraps (which I insist on calling them, although they call them crispies at the stall), but willingly added them in a bag on request. The bottom of the cod was perhaps a little soggy, but the fish flaked away and had a depth of flavour. The batter had some crispiness to it and a pleasant taste, whilst the chips were firm on the exterior and suitably fluffy on the interior. The curry sauce was also served as a generous portion and added to the whole delicious arrangement.

    IMG-20250514-WA0005

    James went for his usual and he was moderately annoyed to discover they’d forgotten that his usual was two small battered sausages and not just one. He forgave them though, one of the few stalls where he would. I do remember the butcher’s sausages that they used to have here and I do miss those, although James was content with the quality of his battered option today.

    I left the stall feeling that I had enough food as it was sufficiently filling and the value for money was excellent. The cod was of a decent quality, the service was friendly, the surroundings were clean and it was good to be back. This is, once again, one of the best stalls that we’ve visited this year on the market. All really rather lovely.

  • Foxley – Church of St. Thomas the Apostle

    Foxley – Church of St. Thomas the Apostle

    20250511_150230

    Next on the tour of Norfolk churches that Richard and I were embarking on was the Church of St. Thomas the Apostle in Foxley. Unfortunately, the church was locked, so I’ll have to limit myself to just the exterior of the building. There has been a church here since Saxon times, although it was rebuilt in stone in the Norman period and most of the nave is from the early fourteenth century and the chancel a little earlier.

    20250511_150532

    I’m assuming these trees mark an extension to the churchyard.

    20250511_145915

    The tower with its not very subtle built-in staircase. The bells in the tower were restored and rededicated in January 2014 by the then Bishop of Norwich, the Rt. Reverend Graham Jones. The bell ringers here have had some challenges over the years, as the Downham Market Gazette reported in November 1879 that £5 was needed to restore the bells as they had been out of use for some time. There was then another fund raiser in 1901 as the bells needs work again, and indeed, nearly every newspaper article mentioning the church over the last 300 years has been about these bells.

    20250511_145934

    The porch was added in the middle of the fifteenth century.

    20250511_145945

    The porch arrangement, now missing its niche statue which was likely removed during the Reformation, was funded by the local Grey family.

    20250511_145953

    The wall painting is from the nineteenth century when the Victorians tidied the building up.

    20250511_145958

    The porch door which is around 700 years old and it does look like it has some heritage to it. I make my usual comment that it still feels special to be able to see a door that has been used by generations by the local congregation and it’s so old that it was originally a door to the pre-reformation Catholic church.

    20250511_150157

    The end of the chancel and this part of the building dates from the late thirteenth century.

    20250511_150127

    The chancel which looks like it was rendered at one point, but that has at some stage mostly fallen off. The render does make quite a lot of sense in terms of protecting the building, and it’s likely the church was rendered for quite a chunk of its history, but it’s nice to see the raw stone underneath.

    20250511_150250

    The side of the chancel, which appears to have been increased at some point given that odd brickwork at the top.

    There are apparently some interesting elements inside, including the fourteenth century font, the old pulpit and the repaired rood screen, but they’ll have to wait until we visit again when the church is open.

  • Greggs – 2015 Receipt

    Greggs – 2015 Receipt

    I wish chicken bakes were that now…. Although, finding these old receipts is reminding me that things weren’t quite as cheap as I seem to remember them being ten years ago.

  • Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (Robert Gardinear / Robert Gardener 1764-1796)

    Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (Robert Gardinear / Robert Gardener 1764-1796)

    20250511_143937

    This gravestone is located at All Saints’ Church in Bawdeswell and it commemorates the life of Robert Gardinear. Although I’m sure that there are a few examples of that surname still around, it seems a more unusual way of spelling the word. Talking about transcription issues, prizes to anyone who can read the age on this gravestone. I initially thought that it said “aged 52 years” but all the transcriptions read “aged 32 years”. Although, this would fit, as the nearest birth that I can find is Robert Gardener who was baptised at this church in Bawdeswell in 1765 and then buried here on 21 April 1796 (having died one week earlier). If the birth is the right Robert, then he was the son of Henry and Elizabeth Gardener (or however they were spelling that).

    Back to the spelling of Gardinear, I’m going to say that’s a mistake dating back to the eighteenth century. There is no record of anyone else of that surname in Norfolk and the spelling of names was quite fluid in the eighteenth century.

  • Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (Robert Leeds 1711-1763) and Alice Leeds (1700-1770)

    Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (Robert Leeds 1711-1763) and Alice Leeds (1700-1770)

    20250511_143735

    This is the ledger stone of Robert Leeds (1711-1761) and his wife Alice Leeds (1700-1770), who were buried in All Saints’ Church in Bawdeswell. I can’t be certain, but I suspect the baptism at Foxley (near to Dereham) on 1 October 1711 (and birth on 18 July 1711) is the same Robert Leeds. He himself was the son of Robert Leeds (not another one…..?) and Mary Leeds.

    He married Alice at St. Mary Church in Sparham on 26 January 1730 and that’s a little bit of an age gap for the time, with Robert being 19 and Alice being 30. They were the parents of Robert Leeds (1736-1807), William Leeds (1740-1798) and John Leeds (1743-1763).

     

  • Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (John Leeds 1743-1763)

    Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (John Leeds 1743-1763)

    20250511_143735

    John Leeds (1743-1763) was the son of Robert Leeds and Alice Leeds, as well as being the brother of William Leeds and Robert Leeds. I can’t though establish why John died so young.

    As I don’t get out much and need a distraction, I’ve been trying to establish how wealthy this family might have been. And I’ve discovered that the presence of these ledger stones isn’t necessarily a sign of high wealth, it was often because they were cheaper than monuments and so it was something that would have been accessible to the middle classes. The individuals would have been buried under these ledger stones, but as the church has been rebuilt twice due to a couple of unfortunate incidents, that may or may not be true here. If it wasn’t for church burials needing to move outside, primarily for health reasons, more churches might well have been completely paved with these ledger stones.

  • Cambridge – Hobson’s Choice

    Cambridge – Hobson’s Choice

    20250513_105323

    I never knew until today that the phrase Hobson’s Choice has its origins in Cambridge. It seems that the origin of this idiom is attributed to Thomas Hobson (1544-1630/1631) who was a carrier and livery stable owner in the city. Hobson ran a thriving business, renting horses to the many students and academics at the university, as well as operating a mail service to London and as part of that he maintained a large stable of around 40 horses.

    Hobson noticed that customers consistently favoured his fastest and strongest horses, leading to their overwork while others remained idle, a situation which he considered entirely sub-optimal. To prevent this and to ensure the well-being of his entire stable, he implemented a strict policy which was that customers had to take the horse nearest to the stable door which was the one that was most rested. If they didn’t want that particular horse, they wouldn’t get any horse from him, so their choice was somewhat limited.

    20250513_105326

    And the plaque on the wall on Regent Street.

  • Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (William Leeds 1740-1798)

    Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (William Leeds 1740-1798)

    20250511_143729

    Once again, I can’t offer very much here due to the paucity of the records that are available. William Leeds (1740-1798) is buried at All Saints’ Church in Bawdeswell and he was the younger brother of Robert Leeds (1736-1807) and the older brother of John Leeds (1743-1763). William was baptised at the church in Billingford in Sparham (the neighbouring village to Bawdeswell, so he didn’t get very far) on 7 June 1740, the son of Robert Leeds and Alice Leeds and he was buried on 26 February 1798.

  • Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (Robert Leeds 1736-1807)

    Bawdeswell – All Saints’ Church (Robert Leeds 1736-1807)

    20250511_143720

    I don’t have much to add to this one, I just liked that at least a few things survived inside the church. This tombstone inside All Saints’ Church in Bawdeswell has survived the church being rebuilt twice and commemorates the life of Robert Leeds. Robert was born in 1736, the elder son of Robert Leeds and Alice Leeds. The older brother of William Leeds (1740-1798) and John Leeds (1743-1763), Robert was buried on 29 January 1807 and the burial record lists him as a yeoman, which is likely a small-scale farmer who owned and cultivated their own land. He must have been doing well enough to be allowed to be buried inside the church, although there are other family members buried near him and perhaps they were the wealthy ones. Referring to a different Robert Leeds, White’s Directory noted in 1845 that “a great part of the soil in the village belongs to Robert Leeds”, so there was some prosperity floating about somewhere in the family. Unfortunately, as I can’t find any mention of him in the newspapers of the time, Robert has rather fallen through the cracks that are historical records.