Walking. Gossip. Travel.

Author: admin

  • Dereham – Church House

    Dereham – Church House

    Church House overlooks Dereham Church and was built in the late seventeenth century to be used by a representative of the church.

    In the early nineteenth century, the property was lived in by James Philo who served as the parish clerk between 1779 and 1829. The sign on the property notes that he featured in George Borrow’s book ‘Lavengro’, the sequel of which was Romany Rye, now the name of the JD Wetherspoon pub which stands around twenty metres away.

    The rear of the property, which backs onto the churchyard. The building is still used by the church and is now the parish office.

  • Dereham – Former Manor House

    Dereham – Former Manor House

    This property is located opposite the entrance to Dereham Church and was originally the Manor House of Oldhall and Syrricks, which sounds very grand. This building dates to the seventeenth century, although was refaced and modernised in the eighteenth century. The pedimented doorcase is apparently original, although I’m going off the word of others here on that….

    The building is also known less excitingly today as 27 Church Street and it has been converted into flats. It’s a larger building than it appears from the front, as there’s a long section behind the property as well. One of the flats came onto the market recently and I like how they’ve converted the attic space.

  • Dereham – Church of St. Nicholas (Where are the Older Gravestones?)

    Dereham – Church of St. Nicholas (Where are the Older Gravestones?)

    One mystery that Richard and I have been discussing on our church walks is where are the gravestones from before 1800? The Hancock Cemetery in Quincy, Massachusetts has many gravestones from the eighteenth century surviving, but in most (but not all of course) churchyards in the UK, there is relatively little before 1800. There are usually some tombs inside churches that are older, but it’s rare to see gravestones from that period outside.

    And so I’ve been reading up on this…. The answer seems to be complex, as history usually is.

    The first element is practical, gravestones aren’t necessarily that resilient and weren’t really designed to last for hundreds of years. Stone erodes, gravestones fall and sometimes they have to be removed because they’re badly damaged.

    The second element is that grave markers before 1800 were often made from wood, which is unlikely to last for much more than fifty years. They were ornately carved in many cases, but not designed to be in their place for centuries. There are some of these at the churchyard in Matlock, but they’re relatively rare now.

    The third element is that most people couldn’t afford a stone gravestone, they’d be expensive and the stone would often have to be imported into the area. Transporting lumps of rock isn’t cheap, it all adds to the cost and a poor family couldn’t have necessarily afforded this. In some areas, rock is more prevalent and this was evident in churchyards such as those as Eyam in Derbyshire, where there are more stones from before 1800.

    The fourth element is that in some churchyards, there wasn’t that much space. Anything older might have been removed in an effort to create space for new burials.

    So, with all those elements combined, it’s more surprising that there are any stones left at all. But, they are there, I found a handful of eighteenth-century gravestones standing in Dereham’s churchyard whilst meandering around today. I also found something I haven’t seen before, eighteenth-century gravestones (and some later ones) which have been laid down and have since been mostly covered over by grass.

    These stones are hard to read, but I could make out a few eighteenth-century dates. They appear to have been moved here at a later date, for reasons that are unknown to me. But, this was an interesting example of where in a churchyard the stones have gone, a handful are still present, a handful have likely been lost and a few have been left to be covered over.

    I suspect I shall return to these thoughts again as I debate with myself exactly where gravestones in Britain have gone….

  • Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue – Day 130

    Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue – Day 130

    The Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue was first published at the end of the eighteenth century, and given that the current health crisis is giving too much time to read books, I thought I’d pick a daily word from it until I got bored….

    Frosty Face

    This not very politically correct term is defined by the dictionary as meaning “one pitted with the small pox”, which also doesn’t suggest a great deal of understanding for the afflicted. The usage of this phrase has shifted since the late eighteenth century, it later became a more generic term for those with a pot-marked face, then more recently it means someone with an unfriendly or hostile look.

    Even in the early part of the twentieth-century there were smallpox outbreaks in the UK, a disease that caused great fear in communities and was dangerous particularly to children. Fortunately, this is one of the diseases that has since been eradicated.

  • Crostwight – Name Origin

    Crostwight – Name Origin

    This is the beautiful church at Crostwight, albeit with its shortened tower thanks to ivy damage.

    Crostwight, Norfolk. Crostwit in Domesday Book, Crostweit in 1211. Clearing by a cross.

    Firstly, I love the name Crostwit, what a shame that didn’t stick for longer. Secondly, this is exactly the same meaning as for Crostwick, another Norfolk village.

  • Crostwight – All Saints’ Church

    Crostwight – All Saints’ Church

    With the exception of the neighbouring rectory, this church stands alone in the fields but it’s clear that it’s still much loved by what local community there is. And, it’s a glorious church, albeit looking a little strange with its squat tower.

    I had many theories for what had happened here, including perhaps a church building project that was halted mid-way through. It was clear from the lower part of the structure that there should be a taller tower here, and that was indeed the case, but it was taken down in 1910 as it was in risk of falling and was covered in ivy. I remember many years ago that there were a fair few churches covered in ivy, but now there are nearly none, they have learned from history.

    There were warnings though even at the time, a Mr Haughton from Church Farm in nearby Ridlington wrote to the Eastern Daily Press in 1905 saying:

    “Sirs, I am much concerned to see the damage which is being done to some of the churches in East Norfolk from ivy being allowed to grow over them. It is difficult to understand the apathy of the archdeacon, rural deans, clergy and churchwardens in allowing such a state of things, which in time must end in the ruin of these fine buildings. Ivy easily roots in these walls, gradually loosens the face flints and slowly but surely the work of destruction goes on.

    I see ivy growing more or less strongly on the churches of Irstead, Crostwight, Walcott, East Ruston, Honing and Witton. Amongst these, the most notable example of the mischief which is being done is in Crostwight Church, strong growing ivy being now nearly to the top of the tower, which in consequence will soon be in a very bad condition.”

    How right he was…. But he wasn’t the only one, in the previous year the Norfolk News had reported that Mr JC Cox had conducted a survey of churches in the area and he was worried about the state of the ivy at Crostwight. He noted “the notion that ivy holds up a building is one of the fond superstitions of Norfolk”. And that is likely why the ivy remained in so many places, many people were thinking that it actually supported and strengthened the building.

    And here’s what the church used to look like, the church tower twice as high as it currently stands.

    Most churches have access to walk alongside the nave, but this one was a little tighter.

    The bulk of the current building dates from the fourteenth century and the exterior hasn’t much changed over the centuries. There’s some real charm to this building, a remote structure with no access to electricity.

    The south porch was added in the fifteenth century, a homely little addition. I had a feeling that this church would be open, so I went into the porch with some confidence that this would be the case. And, it was, but more about this in another post, as there are some treasures inside.

  • Witton – Name Origin

    Witton – Name Origin

    There are two Wittons in Norfolk, one is near Norwich and the other is near to North Walsham. This is what The Concise Oxford Dictionary Of English Placenames has to say about the Witton near to North Walsham.

    Witton, Norfolk. Widituna in Domesday Book, Wottone in 1254. Old English Widutun, a place near a wood.

    There are a few reasons as to the evolution of the place-name Witton, but most are simply a place near a wood, which explains why this is a relatively common name for a settlement. This is though different to Watton in Norfolk, which was named after a person, just to make things more confusing.

  • Witton – St. Margaret’s Church

    Witton – St. Margaret’s Church

    Witton, the one near North Walsham and not the one near Norwich, is located near to the Norfolk coast in an area that no longer has many residential properties nearby. There is evidence of two Saxon windows in the nave of the church, but for the most part the current structure dates to the twelfth-century rebuild, albeit fiddled about with in the Victorian period.

    An aisle has been added to the south side of the church, but not to the north.

    Two views of the north side of the church, with the Saxon windows evident either side of the porch, which were later discoveries. The chancel was rebuilt in 1857, explaining its more modern feel.

    The chancel end of the church.

    The south porch and main entrance into the church, with its rather intriguing small window with brick surround. There’s a large graveyard around the church, with a surprising number of more recent burials given the limited amount of properties nearby.

  • Drayton – Name Origin

    Drayton – Name Origin

    In my occasional series about the name origins of places in Norfolk, this is what The Concise Oxford Dictionary Of English Placenames has to say about Drayton. And, it’s complex, as Drayton is a common placename across the UK, with numerous reasons for the evolution of the name.

    Drayton, Norfolk. Draituna in Domesday Book. 

    The book goes on to offer a series of explanations, which are based around the word ‘draeg’, the Old English for ‘to drag’. So, it’s seen as a place where something has been, or has to be, dragged, perhaps a boat, or logs. It can also mean to ‘pull up a hill’, so Drayton might be explained by being on a hill. The book doesn’t give a specific reason for the Drayton in Norfolk, but I’m going with the place where wood has to be dragged. This also fits in with the village sign, unless anyone else knows better…..

    As an aside, the word ‘dray’, better known as a beer delivery, comes from the word to be dragged, or pulled. It later became used to mean a sledge, and eventually as a way of moving beer.

  • Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue – Day 129

    Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue – Day 129

    The Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue was first published at the end of the eighteenth century, and given that the current health crisis is giving too much time to read books, I thought I’d pick a daily word from it until I got bored….

    Friday-Face

    The dictionary definition for this sad phrase is “a dismal countenance. Before, and even long after the Reformation, Friday was a day of abstinence, or jour maigre. Immediately, after the restoration of King Charles II, a proclamation was issued, prohibiting all publicans from dressing any suppers on a Friday”.

    I’m not sure I fully understand the context of “dressing a supper”, but dressing used to mean preparing, so I assume it meant that food couldn’t be served at all. It was also men loyal to Cromwell who were puritans, so many were relieved when King Charles II was restored to the throne. Friday was though a fast day for Catholics, which is still seen today with fish being a popular dish on Fridays as that wasn’t banned.

    It could have been a ‘Wednesday face’ and ‘Friday face’ though if John Wesley would have gotten his way, he wanted fasting on both of these days. The Wednesday fast would have represented the Betrayal of Christ and the Friday fast would have represented the Death of Christ.